, Telefunken U47 vs Neumann U47 Review; Rode NT2A vs Neumann TLM-103 Review ; Sennheiser e865 vs e965 Review; Studio Projects B1 vs MXL 990 Review; Audix VX5 vs Shure BETA 87A Review; Samson SE10 vs SE50 Review; Tweet. With accurate transient detail and extended frequency response, the kms 105 can offer a superior resolution of the voice, when compared to other handled vocal condenser mics. While not interfering with the mic’s frequency response or sensitivity, the 5-piece mesh head provides the mic with plosive noises, wind, and filtering of breath. The unidirectional supercardioid pickup pattern reduces the susceptibility to feedback and limits background noise. In addition, it is not only lightweight, but also comes with a luxurious looking design. Blast protection plate to shield the microphone from high sound pressure; Best quality rejection that handles noise accordingly; Extended dynamic response with pronounced vocal and presence punch; and, Includes a MZQ 800 microphone pouch and clip. Built-in, highly effective suppression of popping noises. The manufacturers have worked hard to ensure that one can achieve the best sound with high quality standards by utilizing and including all the best features in condenser microphone technology. Therefore, this rugged handled condenser includes two pickup patterns. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. High-strength and heat-treated mesh head; Effective pop shielding that has no side effects; Supercardioid polar pattern with excellent feedback rejection; Excellent transparency for speech/vocals; Vocal condenser microphone for crystal clear highs deep lows; and. In case you are a singer, you will not have any problem holding the e865 for long periods of performance time since it is designed in a pretty solid design that comes with a weight less than 1 lb. The kms 105 microphone is specially designed to transmit a very detailed capture of the human voice, allowing for accurate representation of clear details found in speech and music since the frequency response characteristic is developed in the acoustic realm. More from my site. David Clark H10-30 vs H10-13.4 vs H10-13.4 Review, Fender FA-100 vs Epiphone DR-100 vs Jasmine S35 Review, Alesis DM6 vs DM7X vs DM8 vs DM10 vs DM10 X Review. Happy. In addition, you will experience the ruggedness of this stage vocal condenser microphone and the signature sensitivity associated with studio condenser microphones, when you step on the stage to perform using the Sennheiser e965. Click here to purchase Neumann KMS 105 on Amazon! You will get the real value of your money when you purchase the e965 microphone since it has been individually handmade in Germany and also comes with a 10-year warranty. Pin It. Telefunken U47 vs Neumann U47 Review. 1.89 in. In addition, the frequency response has been engineered and specially designed to ensure that the vocals are clear when one is performing. OVERALL OPINION The Sennheiser E 965 is a very clear, present microphone … Color. Good luck! This website uses cookies to improve your experience. (I'd like to try the PL80a and the D5. Cardioid (KK 104 S) and Supercardioid (KK 105 S) characteristic. Dual-diaphragm with switchable pick-up pattern (supercardioid/cardioid). Sennheiser e965 does not lack richness; it may be a bit less hyped than Neumann KMS 105 but it has more depth to it. Related Posts . 5501 U.S. Hwy 30 W, Fort Wayne, IN 46818 It can also eliminate similar problems common to other handheld vocal condenser microphones. In addition, it is important to take note that neither of these microphones is neutral-sounding in case you are looking for a neutral vocal condenser microphone. In order to reduce loss over long cable runs, the high-standard output of the Rode s1 comes with additional benefits and is carefully balanced to reject high levels of electromagnetic interference. Low susceptibility to handling noise. Available in black (kms 105 black) and silver (kms 105 silver) finish. But I think either a Sennheiser e965 vs Neumann KMS 105 or 104 (which apparently has a bit more bass proximity) is a GREAT choice. This microphone can easily eliminate any ‘muffling’ or ‘clouding’ of the sound because no foam is used in the basket. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. For example, the e965 includes a dual-diaphragm with switchable pick-up patterns (supercardioid and cardioid). Technical Data. Happy customers, one piece of gear at a time! The Sennheiser e965 large-diaphragm stage condenser vocal microphone comes with 40Hz-20 kHz frequency response, 10Db Pad, low-cut switch, super cardioid pickup and switchable cardioid patterns. Recently, microphones have rapidly evolved from an ordinary microphone to an advanced version that has greatly embraced the new technology. Pure, open, and neutral sound transmission. Happy customers, one piece of gear at a time! Are you talking polar pattern, proximity? Click here to purchase Sennheiser e865 on Amazon! It would be appropriate to say that the e865 is a super microphone for using on the stage simply because it is packed with smoothness, clarity, presence and power. On the other hand, the ergonomic design of the Rode s1 ensures maximum comfort that can allow one to control and hold the mike during performance. The e865 vocal microphone also comes with a refined steel and a sound inlet basket. Related Posts. Colbert. I still use the OM7 and the 767a, he's currently using the 935. to avoid being bulky. Pin It. Nowadays, you can easily achieve new standards of quality and best sound, using either the Sennheiser e865 or e965 microphones. David Clark H10-30 vs H10-13.4 vs H10-13.4 Review, Fender FA-100 vs Epiphone DR-100 vs Jasmine S35 Review, Alesis DM6 vs DM7X vs DM8 vs DM10 vs DM10 X Review. Click here to purchase Sennheiser e965 on Amazon! It would be right to say that the kms 105 and the Rode s1 can both be terrible on the wrong vocalists and good on the right ones. Click here to purchase Sennheiser e965 on Amazon! You can learn more about these two microphones using this product review and choose the microphone that perfectly fits your objectives and intention of use. Exclusive deals, delivered straight to your inbox. Colbert. The e865 is a high standard and fully professional vocal microphone with amazing features to enable you achieve sweet, smooth sound. Phone Hours | What do you mean by this? On the other hand, to assist in eliminating wind noise and rumble, this microphone features a 10Db pad and a low-cut switch. For a very deep voice, it could perhaps use a bit of external low cut in a supercardioid mode (according to taste), as larger diaphragm moves the proximity response to a lower frequency. You can easily switch the pickup for the applications given that the e965 connects you with two different polar patterns (supercardioid and cardioid). However, you should take note that they have a few differences, hence some of their features aren’t alike. Telefunken U47 vs Neumann U47 Review; Rode S1 vs Neumann KMS 105 Review; Rode NT2A vs Neumann TLM-103 Review; Studio Projects B1 vs MXL 990 Review; Shure BETA 57A vs SM57 Review; RHA MA750i vs Shure SE215 Review; Tweet. Click here to purchase Neumann KMS 105 on Amazon! 1.89 in. Steve Steele February 5, 2012 @10:46am. Get Directions | Sweetwater Sound Sennheiser e 965 Shop now at Amazon. You will also get an excellent 40Hz-20 kHz frequency response using this microphone. When you have a quick glance at the two Sennheiser microphones, you will easily assume that they resemble each other’s features. Sign Up For Email Offers! They both come with amazing features that precisely meets various types of vocal needs. Plus, you can be assured of enjoying Sennheiser’s proven stage ruggedness and the sensitivity you would expect from the best quality studio condenser microphone when you use the e965. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Neumann capsule head engineering expands with Sennheiser liveperformance engineering.